Archive for September, 2010

U.N. Flotilla Probe: “Even If Bin Laden Himself Were on Ship, Israel’s Blockade Still Illegal”

 

NGO: U.N. Probe Ignored Evidence on Islamist Passengers’ Bid for ‘Martyrdom’

GENEVA, Sept. 28 – The U.N. commission into Israel’s May 31 flotilla clash declared during a U.N. Human Rights Council debate today that “even if Bin Laden himself were on the Mavi Maramara, Israel’s blockade would still be illegal.”

The statement was made by commissioner Desmond de Silva in response to questions posed in the council plenary by the Geneva-based UN Watch as to why the probe ignored voluminous evidence it submitted regarding the stated intentions of the Islamist flotilla members to physically confront Israel and become “Shahids,” or martyrs. (See below for statement and response from UN flotilla commission.)

The chair of the flotilla probe, Judge Karl T. Hudson-Phillips, said that he had never heard the term “Shahid” before. However, he insisted that, in any event, the intentions of the IHH activists carried no legal relevance. Continue reading ‘U.N. Flotilla Probe: “Even If Bin Laden Himself Were on Ship, Israel’s Blockade Still Illegal”’

U.N. Flotilla Debate: Hillel Neuer on English-language Russian TV

Watch video here

From Russia Today:

Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, told RT that the results of the recent UN report on the flotilla incident were pre-determined.

“This report was determined in advance, the Human Rights Council held an emergency session only a day or two after the flotilla incident happened,” Neuer said. “They declared Israel guilty of ‘an outrageous attack’, so the outcome was entirely pre-determined, and this is not something that’s exceptional.”

“In fact, Mary Robinson, who was the UN rights chief, said the Human Rights Council has a pattern of acting politically and not for human rights,” Hillel Neuer added. “Let’s remember who the membership is – Saudi Arabia, China, Colonel Gaddafi of Libya is now a member of the Human Rights Council. This is not a body that cares about human rights. This is a body that is political, that is engaged in a constant campaign to de-legitimize Israel, and human rights is the last thing on the minds of members like Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Libya.”

Background on today’s UN Human Right Council Flotilla Report

Geneva, Sept. 27 – The credibility of today’s UN Human Rights Council report on the May 31 flotilla incident is marred by a predetermined verdict, said UN Watch, a non-governmental human rights organization based in Geneva, Switzerland.

“The mandate of the probe violated due process and objectivity by presuming Israeli guilt from the outset,” said Hillel Neuer, UN Watch executive director. “It’s another example of what former UN rights chief Mary Robinson recently described as the unfortunate and regrettable practice by the council to adopt resolutions guided not by human rights but by politics.” [See Note 1]

According to Neuer, “by declaring Israel guilty before any facts were even collected, the resolution tainted the mission with prejudicial bias, and contravened the UN’s own Declaration on Fact Finding, which requires objectivity and impartiality.”

“It speaks volumes that Khaled Mashaal, the leader of the Hamas terrorist group, asked for this probe-literally for the council to create ‘another Goldstone report’-while the Palestinian Authority actually opposed it,” said Neuer.

“The perception of the council’s one-sided approach and lack of credibility is so severe that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s office in New York has completely ignored this probe in seeking to establish their own.”

“Tragically, rather than contribute to defusing the Arab-Israeli conflict and bringing people together with an objective, human rights approach, the council has played a divisive role with inflammatory statements that only increase frictions,” said Neuer.

Background on Resolution HRC 14/1 Establishing the Probe:

The Resolution: Barely 48 hours after the incident, the probe was created by a June 2, 2010 council resolution, initiated by the council’s Islamic and Arab groups of states, that condemned Israel “in the strongest terms” as guilty of committing an “outrageous attack” on the flotilla. Despite video evidence already available at the time, the resolution omitted any reference to the beating of Israeli soldiers by Turkish IHH militants brandishing knives, axes and metal rods, and of their televised admissions to seeking Jihad and martyrdom.

Who Voted For It: Those countries voting in favor of the resolution included China, Cuba, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Russia. The U.S., Italy and Netherlands voted against it. France, Britain, Japan, Belgium, Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine, South Korea, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Zambia, and Madagacar all abstained or deliberately chose to absent themselves.

Hamas Called for Probe: As the Human Rights Council was meeting for its urgent debate on the flotilla, Hamas politburo chief Khaled Mashaal demanded the creation of a probe like the council’s 2009 Goldstone Report.[2]

Addressing a crowd of masses in the Yemeni capital of Sana on June 1, Mashal accused Israel of committing serious crimes against the flotilla and urged the international community not to let the Jewish state escape punishment. Mashaal congratulated “all the countries and nations which stood by our side.”[3]

“We need a new ‘Goldstone report,’ which will condemn Israel,” said Mashaal. “In addition, (Israeli Defense Minister Ehud) Barak, (Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu and all the Zionist leaders must be put on trail for being war criminals.” Mashaal thanked the sail’s participants and Turkey, and called on all Arab countries to adopt a similar policy to the one taken by Ankara against Israel.[4]

Hamas has now praised the final report.

Palestinian Authority Opposed It: According to the Electronic Intifada news website, the Palestinian Authority actively sought to frustrate the Human Rights Council’s establishment of the probe, because its officials understood that it would strengthen Hamas, emboldening extremists over moderates.[5]



Notes: 

[1] See Mary Robinson quote here, from Geneva’s Le Temps, Feb. 4, 2009.

[2] Roee Nahmias, “Mashal wants Goldstone report on sail,” Ynet, June 1, 2010.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

5] Asa Winstanley, “Exclusive: Leaked documents show PA undermined Turkey’s push for UN flotilla probe,” The Electronic Intifada, 22 June 2010, at http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11350.shtml.

UN plenary silences NGO challenge to impartiality of Goldstone Follow-Up panel


Geneva, September 27 - The U.N. chastised a non-governmental organization today after it challenged the independence and impartiality of the head of its Goldstone Report follow-up committee, noting he had performed work for Yasser Arafat and had a long record of describing Israel as a “state terrorist.” Continue reading ‘UN plenary silences NGO challenge to impartiality of Goldstone Follow-Up panel’

Submitted Testimony Disregarded by the UN Human Rights Council’s Flotilla Probe

In a 17 September 2010 communication to UN Watch, the UN Human Rights Council flotilla probe stated that “all the information that [was] made available through UN Watch has been studied by the fact-finding mission.” In fact, however, with one exception, the 40-plus items below were entirely ignored by the inquiry and its report.

Continue reading ‘Submitted Testimony Disregarded by the UN Human Rights Council’s Flotilla Probe’

Global NGO Campaign to Remove Libya from the UN Human Rights Council

panel
The election of the Libyan Arab Jamahariya to the United Nations Human Rights Council is an outrage to the global human rights community. Given its notorious record as one of the world’s worst violators of human rights, the Qaddafi regime’s membership on the Council flies in the face of the United Nations’ promise, enshrined in Resolution 60/251 (2006), to elect member states that are committed to the promotion and protection of human rights.

As a global coalition of non-governmental organizations dedicated to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we refuse to remain silent. We call on the international community to invoke Article 8 of the aforementioned resolution, which provides for the suspension of membership of states that commit systematic violations of human rights, unless and until the Qaddafi regime:

·  Ends its systematic violation of the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the right to equality, the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to free political organization;

·  Ends its practices of arbitrary arrest, torture, and discrimination against minorities, in particular, the persecution of two million black African migrants;

·  Acknowledges its crimes committed against the six medical workers, who were framed in 1998 under false charges of poisoning children with HIV, and then imprisoned, tortured, and sentenced to death row; apologizes; and provides full compensation to the six victims;

·  Acknowledges its crimes in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and ceases to celebrate the convicted Libyan agent who was released from prison last year;

·   Agrees to an international, independent investigation into the imprisonment and torture of Libyan human rights activist and dissident Fathi Eljahmi, resulting finally in his death in 2009; and

·   Agrees to an international, independent investigation into the massacre of an estimated 1200 prisoners of the Abu Salim prison.

Robert Monetti
Victims of Pan Am 103 Association

Dr. Mohamed M. Bugaighis
American Libyan Freedom Alliance

Hillel C. Neuer
United Nations Watch, Switzerland

Franck Kamunga
Droits Humains Sans Frontieres

Bart Woord
International Federation of Liberal Youth

Khaled Ghawi
Association of Libya Imal / Libya Future

Mamadi Kaba
African Assembly for the Defense of Human Rights (Raddho-Guinee)

Amina Bouayach
Moroccan Organization for Human Rights (OMDH)

Mike Gesa Munabi
Students for Global Democracy Uganda

Gibreil I. M. Hamid
Darfur Peace and Development Center

Dr. Theodor Rathgeber
Forum Human Rights, Germany

Siaka Coulibaly
Burkina Faso Civil Society Organizations Network for Development

Tilder Kumichii Ndichia
Gender Empowerment and Development

Kok Ksor
The Montagnard Foundation

Ulrich Delius
Society for Threatened Peoples, Germany

Harris O. Schoenberg
UN Reform AdvocatesMaría José Zamora Solórzano
Movimiento por Nicaragua 

Sister Catherine C. Waters
Catholic International Education Office (OIEC)

Sylvia G. Iriondo
Mothers & Women Against Repression

Mrs. C. Gautam
Nepal International Consumers Union

Logan Maurer
International Christian Concern

Obinna Egbuka
Youth Enhancement Organization, Nigeria

Virginia S. Mueller
International Association of Women Lawyers

Dickson Mugendi David Ntwiga
Solidarity House International

Robert Triozzi
Chief, FRDP

Klaus Netter
Main Representative, CBJO

Armand Azoulai
Main Representative, BBI

Dr. Marlette Black
International Presentation Association

U.S. SENATOR MENENDEZ’S STATEMENT ON U.N. HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL SEATING OF LIBYAN REPRESENTATIVE

[Ed. Note: The following statement was issued in support of UN Watch's campaign, launched today, to remove Libya from the UN Human Rights Council.]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 16, 2010

CONTACT:
Menendez Press Office (202) 224-4744

WASHINGTON – Last May Libya was elected to the United Nations Human Rights Council, the UN body that promotes the protection of human rights and denounces human rights violations.  Libya is expected to take its seat on the Council in Geneva on Thursday. Senator Menendez, a member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, issued the following statement:

“The election of Libya to the United Nations’ group that promotes human rights around the globe is deplorable,” said Senator Menendez. “Not only has Libya historically scoffed at efforts to protect the rights of others, it places no value on the mandate that guides the Council, promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in a fair and equal manner.” 

“It has placed little value on Libyan lives, conducting arbitrary arrests and torture, thwarting freedom of speech, and political organization. I am also aware of the pain Libya has caused the families of the 189 American victims of Pan Am flight 103 that exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, bombed by convicted killer Abdelaset al-Megrahi, who was recently released from prison under questionable circumstances.  I am currently poised to begin a hearing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the facts surrounding that release and Megrahi’s return to Libya to a hero’s welcome. I hope the U.N. Human Rights Council listens to witnesses like Robert Monetti, a New Jerseyan who lost his son on that ill-fated flight, and ceases to include representatives in this body that do not have a history and tradition of respect for life and human rights.”

At the UN: Victims of Bombed Pan Am Flight 103 Urge Libya’s Removal from UN Human Rights Council



Remarks by Robert Monetti
NGO Panel Event at United Nations European Headquarters, Geneva
“Libya on the UN Human Rights Council”
Hosted by UN Watch, September 16, 2010

Good Morning.  My Name is Bob Monetti.  I am a retired engineer from Cherry Hill, New Jersey in the USA.  I wasn’t very interested in the workings of the United Nations until the past 22 years.  It seems that there is a lot of hypocrisy involved in the workings of the UN.

The U.N. General Assembly established the UN Human Rights Council on 15 March 2006, in order to replace the previous Human Rights Commission, which had been heavily criticized for allowing countries with poor human rights records to be members.  Things don’t seem any better today.

Allowing Libya to be involved in the UNHRC in any way is a travesty.  Libya is a dictatorship, which doesn’t protect its citizens’ human rights and flagrantly murders citizens of other countries. 

My son was a 20-year-old Syracuse University student, studying abroad for a semester in London.  Sadly he was a passenger on Pan Am Flight 103 when it blew up over Lockerbie Scotland in December of 1988.  He and 269 other innocents perished at Libya’s hand. Many of the passengers, like my Rick, were college students.  Most were under 24 years old.

Finally, in 2001 a Libyan intelligence agent, Megrahi, was convicted by a Scottish court at a trial that was held in an obscure location in the Netherlands.  The press coverage, other than the first and last days, was almost nonexistent. The trial was long and detailed.  Many damning facts were presented, none of which was refuted by the defense.   The verdict was correct.  We all understood that Megrahi didn’t act alone and he didn’t act on his own, but there wasn’t sufficient evidence to indict or convict his superiors. 

In 2003, Libya finally accepted responsibility for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in a letter to the UN.

Hearing Libya admit responsibility for the bombing and knowing that at least one murderer was in jail in Scotland gave some small consolation and some sort of “closure” to the victims’ families.  The “compassionate release” last year by the Scots, and the circus that followed, ended that with a thud.

monetti

The son of the dictator flew his private plane to Scotland to escort the murderer back to Libya, where Gadhafi gave him a hero’s welcome.  This is the punishment Libya gives to convicted human rights abusers.

A French court convicted Libya of the 1989 bombing of the French UTA plane over Chad.  They admitted giving explosives and weapons to the IRA during the “troubles” in Northern Ireland. 

They may still be holding the Swiss businessmen that they detained in retaliation for the Swiss treatment of Gadhafi son’s for his thuggish behavior in a Swiss hotel.  There were many more human rights violations by Gadhafi’s regime, but time is short today.

I guess a Libyan government official would be able to recognize a human rights abuse – but he’d just think of it as “business as usual.”

In March of 1989, friends and relatives of those murdered formed the “Victims of Pan Am Flight 103″ (VPAF103). The group gave me the job of Aviation Security. I’ve worked on aviation security issues for most of the past 22-1/2 years. I was the VPAF103 representative on the US FAA Aviation Security Advisory Committee (ASAC), until the TSA took over. I served as the only “civilian” member of the Baseline Working Group in 1996. I’ve worked as a consultant to the FAA for 3 years. I was a member of the US airport Public Safety and Security Committee (ACI-NA). I have attended many aviation security seminars, symposia, and meetings; and have spoken at several. I witnessed most of the bombproof container tests and several of the explosive tests in aircraft.

In January of 1998, the FAA conducted a test in Mobile, Alabama. They bought an old Lockheed L-1011. They filled several luggage containers with unclaimed bags and pressurized the plane to 9 PSIG. In one of the suitcases, was a small improvised explosive device (IED). The bomb was similar to the size that Megrahi used to blow up Pan Am 103.  The plane instantly unpeeled and the cockpit fell off. It looked just like the reconstructed Pan Am 747.

Make no mistake.  Megrahi was one of the people who planted the bomb on PA103.  He was a high-ranking member of Libyan intelligence. (oxymoron?) He had 2 two passports. The second one was only used once on December 20-21, 1988 to fly in and out of Malta.  He had a Swiss bank account of more than one million dollars.  The piece of timer found in the wreckage matched the ones that Mebo (a Swiss company) only built for Libyan intelligence.  

With almost unlimited oil money, Libya has financed a 10-year-long relentless media campaign in the UK to discredit the trial, the evidence and the conviction. And it worked. Gadhafi not only kills at will, but he also manages to get away with it.

While freedom of speech is a right in all democratic countries, it is not a right that Gadhafi gives his own people. 

As long as Gadhafi sits on all that oil, he can do whatever he pleases and get away with it. There’s no morality in politics. World politics is about business, and in Libya, business is about oil. 

Why ever would the U.N. let Gadhafi judge other countries’ human rights records?

Lockerbie Bombing Victims: Remove Qaddafi from U.N. Rights Council

27 NGOs to Launch Campaign to Suspend Libya

Geneva, September 15 — Bob Monetti of Cherry Hill, New Jersey, whose 20-year-old son was murdered in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, will tomorrow be one of several victims of Libyan human rights violations addressing the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, to protest the Qaddafi government’s new membership on the controversial 47-nation body. Monetti will be representing the Lockerbie Victims Association.

In tandem, a global coalition of 27 human rights groups, led by the Geneva-based UN Watch, will launch a campaign calling on U.N. member states to remove Libya from the council under a clause allowing for suspension of countries that commit systematic violations of human rights.

The government of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi took its seat on the council for the first time this week, in a 3-week session that concludes on October 1st. This will allow Libya to influence the definition of women’s rights, mandates on freedom of speech and religion, and an expected two resolutions on Israel. The council was created in 2006 to replace the discredited Human Rights Commission, which earned scorn when Libya was elected as chair in 2003.

Also presenting tomorrow will be Mohamed Eljahmi, brother of the late Fathi Eljahmi, one of Libya’s most well-known political prisoners and torture victims; Kristyana Valcheva, one of the five Bulgarian nurses who were framed, imprisoned and tortured for eight years on false charges of poisoning children with HIV; and Ashraf El-Hajouj, the Palestinian doctor framed and tortured together with the nurses.


Rick Monetti, killed on Pan Am Flight 103